Today: August 19, 2026
Reportingscams.com

Corrections & Removal Policy

Corrections & Removal Policy

Effective Date: March 1, 2026

Our Commitment

ReportingScams.com is committed to responsible investigative journalism, editorial independence, and factual accuracy.

We recognize that information changes over time, new evidence may emerge, regulatory proceedings evolve, and mistakes can occasionally occur.

This policy explains how we review requests for factual corrections, article updates, clarifications, and removal of published content.

Our goal is to maintain an accurate public record while preserving editorial independence and the public’s right to access information of legitimate public interest.


1. Our Editorial Responsibility

We publish investigations, scam alerts, company reviews, consumer protection articles, fraud analysis, cryptocurrency reports, and news based on information that we reasonably believe to be reliable at the time of publication.

Our reporting may rely on:

  • Court records
  • Regulatory actions
  • Government publications
  • Corporate filings
  • Official company statements
  • Publicly available consumer complaints
  • Archived web content
  • News reporting
  • Public discussion forums
  • Public blockchain information
  • User-submitted evidence that has been reasonably reviewed

Because investigations often continue after publication, articles may be updated as new information becomes available.


2. Our Commitment to Accuracy

Accuracy is fundamental to our editorial process.

If we determine that published content contains a factual error, we will review the matter promptly and make appropriate changes where warranted.

Possible editorial actions include:

  • Correcting factual inaccuracies.
  • Updating outdated information.
  • Adding additional context.
  • Including official responses.
  • Clarifying ambiguous language.
  • Publishing an editor’s note.
  • Revising headlines where appropriate.

Our objective is to improve accuracy rather than erase the historical record.


3. What Qualifies as a Correction Request

A correction request may be appropriate when published content contains:

  • Incorrect factual information.
  • Incorrect dates.
  • Incorrect names.
  • Incorrect company details.
  • Incorrect legal status.
  • Incorrect regulatory information.
  • Incorrect quotations.
  • Incorrect references to public records.
  • Material omissions that significantly alter factual context.

To assist our review, requests should include credible supporting documentation.


4. What Does Not Qualify as a Correction

The following generally do not constitute factual errors:

  • Disagreement with our editorial opinions.
  • Disagreement with investigative conclusions.
  • Negative publicity resulting from truthful reporting.
  • Lawfully published public records.
  • Regulatory actions accurately reported.
  • Court proceedings accurately described.
  • Consumer complaints accurately summarized.
  • Publicly available information fairly referenced.
  • Statements clearly identified as allegations.
  • Information accurately attributed to third-party sources.

The fact that information is unfavorable does not necessarily make it inaccurate.


5. Removal Requests

ReportingScams.com carefully evaluates requests seeking removal of published content.

However, we generally do not remove articles solely because:

  • They are critical.
  • They are embarrassing.
  • They negatively affect reputation.
  • They appear in search engine results.
  • A company or individual objects to the publication.
  • Business circumstances have changed.
  • Search engine optimization concerns exist.

As an investigative journalism publication, preserving the public record is an important editorial principle.


6. Circumstances Where Removal May Be Considered

Although removal is uncommon, we may consider it where appropriate, including situations involving:

  • Verified publication errors that cannot reasonably be corrected.
  • Court orders requiring removal.
  • Legal obligations under applicable law.
  • Accidental publication of confidential personal information.
  • Identity theft or impersonation.
  • Serious safety concerns.
  • Clearly fraudulent submissions.
  • Other exceptional circumstances determined by our editorial team.

Each request is assessed individually.


7. Requests to Update Articles

Information often changes after publication.

Where supported by credible evidence, we may update articles to reflect:

  • Court decisions.
  • Regulatory outcomes.
  • Company responses.
  • Successful appeals.
  • Business closures.
  • Official investigations.
  • New documentary evidence.
  • Subsequent developments relevant to readers.

Updates help maintain accuracy while preserving the original publication where appropriate.


8. Right of Reply

ReportingScams.com supports responsible journalism and recognizes that individuals and organizations discussed in our reporting may wish to provide clarification or additional context.

Where appropriate, we may:

  • Include an official response.
  • Publish additional information.
  • Update an article with verified developments.
  • Add editorial clarification.
  • Reference publicly available statements.

Responses should be factual, supported by evidence, and relevant to the published content.


9. Evidence Required

To evaluate correction or update requests, we may request supporting documentation such as:

  • Court orders.
  • Regulatory decisions.
  • Government records.
  • Corporate filings.
  • Official company statements.
  • Documentary evidence.
  • Public records.
  • Identity verification where necessary.
  • Other reliable supporting material.

Unsupported assertions may not be sufficient to justify editorial changes.


10. How to Submit a Request

Please include:

  • Article title or URL.
  • A detailed description of the issue.
  • The specific information you believe is incorrect.
  • Supporting documentation.
  • Relevant official records where available.
  • Your contact information.

Providing complete information helps us review requests more efficiently.


11. Editorial Review Process

Upon receiving a request, our editorial team may:

  • Review the published material.
  • Examine supporting documentation.
  • Verify publicly available records.
  • Consult original reporting.
  • Request additional information.
  • Seek clarification from the requesting party.
  • Consider whether an editorial update is appropriate.

Every request is evaluated individually.

Submission of a request does not guarantee that an article will be changed or removed.


12. Timeframe

We strive to review legitimate requests within a reasonable period.

The time required may vary depending on:

  • The complexity of the request.
  • Availability of supporting documentation.
  • The need for additional verification.
  • Ongoing legal or regulatory proceedings.

More complex matters may require additional time for review.


13. Search Engine Results

ReportingScams.com does not control how third-party search engines index or display our content.

Questions relating to search engine rankings, indexing, cached pages, or search results should generally be directed to the relevant search engine provider.

Editorial decisions regarding published content remain independent of search engine visibility.


14. Editorial Independence

Our correction process is guided by evidence rather than commercial interests.

We do not accept payment in exchange for:

  • Removing articles.
  • Changing investigative findings.
  • Publishing favorable coverage.
  • Improving company ratings.
  • Suppressing accurate reporting.

Editorial integrity remains central to every decision we make.


15. Good Faith Requests

We welcome good-faith requests intended to improve factual accuracy.

We encourage individuals and organizations to provide complete, accurate, and verifiable information that assists our editorial review.

Constructive engagement helps improve the quality of public information.


16. Abusive or Repetitive Requests

ReportingScams.com reserves the right to decline requests that are:

  • Repetitive without new evidence.
  • Abusive or threatening.
  • Intended to harass our editorial team.
  • Unsupported by credible documentation.
  • Clearly frivolous or made in bad faith.

Nothing in this policy limits any legal rights available under applicable law.


17. Policy Updates

This Corrections & Removal Policy may be updated periodically to reflect changes in our editorial practices, legal obligations, or operational procedures.

The most recent version will always be available on ReportingScams.com.


18. Contact Us

Correction requests, article update requests, or removal enquiries may be submitted to:

Editorial Team

Email: [email protected]

To help us process your request efficiently, please include the relevant article URL and all supporting documentation.


19. Our Promise

ReportingScams.com exists to serve the public interest through responsible investigative journalism.

We believe accurate reporting, transparency, accountability, and fair editorial practices are essential to consumer protection.

When credible evidence demonstrates that information should be corrected or updated, we will review it carefully and act where appropriate.

At the same time, we are committed to preserving truthful reporting and maintaining an accurate historical record for the benefit of readers, researchers, consumers, and the public.

Go toTop