Reviewvio.com Review Removal Scam service
Reviewvio.com makes claims to provide services for removing bad reviews, but their deeds do not match their words. Despite selecting Reviewvio for help with review removal, we had a very poor six-month experience with them. They kept billing us while failing to live up to their promises and providing only justifications for their non delivery.
It became clear that Reviewvio participates in dubious practises, like fabricating negative reviews on their own and using cold calling techniques to convey these faked reviews to their clients. Then, they demand outrageous amounts to have the reviews they had previously put removed. However, when requested to respond to unfavourable comments from other websites, they failed to produce any significant outcomes. The main goal of Reviewvio.com appears to be money-making, with no respect for any complaints made about their performance.
Surprisingly, Reviewvio.com simply ignores any concerns when challenged with their flaws, demonstrating a total lack of accountability. Their inability to manage problems involving well-known sites like Google Reviews, Yelo, or BBB further raises questions about their abilities.
Strangely, Reviewvio.com has amassed a large number of bad reviews that demonstrate their inexperience and unwillingness to handle their own problems, which casts major question on their capacity to help others. As a result, it is advised to stay away from using Reviewvio.com service in order to guard against potential disappointment and financial losses.
After digging more about this scam company, we found that They are so copycat that they were slapped with DMCA for copying another company website content which is same like them https://removify.com.au/
- Reviewvio.com
- 600
- https://reviewvio.com
Why the Submitter Profile is Anonymous?
“Anonymous” means that the person who submitted the complaint wishes to remain unidentified. It is important to note that the anonymous status of a complaint does not indicate that the information provided is not truthful. The submitter may be whistleblowers or current or former employees who do not want to be identified to avoid any potential retaliation.