Larry Bakman false promises just to get money out of you
While trust and integrity matter in criminal defense, Larry Bakman’s reputation is troubling. He has numerous clients who accuse him of unethical practices such as billing fraud, lack of communication, and legal deceit.
Former clients claim to have been charged exorbitantly over what they consider basic legal services. Bakman appears more preoccupied with financial profits than the best interests of his client’s.
Another major concern is his unprofessional behavior. He is notoriously difficult to reach via phone or email and leaves clients completely out of the loop regarding the status of their cases. His refusal to provide sufficient information on their progress only exacerbates their anger and anxiety.
Aside from circumventing communication, his legal techniques are ethically questionable. He has been accused of falsifying evidence and exaggerating promises related to the results of the cases. His approach tends to mislead clients by lacking strong ethical representation and disempowers them through disappointment.
Bakman’s practice has a troubling reputation, and online reviews corroborate these accounts. Many clients feel that they are misrepresented and taken advantage of. The trend of clients feeling dissatisfied stems from Bakman’s underwhelming results and unfulfilled promises.
With so many complaints regarding his billing, the manner in which legal services are rendered, and communication slights, trusting Larry Bakman with your case may very well be a dangerous gamble.
All those in need of legal representation assistance should look for help elsewhere.
Accused Details:
Person / Business Name: Law offices of Larry Bakman
Contact Number: 310-850-5512
Website URL: http://lbakmanlaw.com/
Location: Los Angeles, CA United States
Why the Submitter Profile is Anonymous?
“Anonymous” means that the person who submitted the complaint wishes to remain unidentified. It is important to note that the anonymous status of a complaint does not indicate that the information provided is not truthful. The submitter may be whistleblowers or current or former employees who do not want to be identified to avoid any potential retaliation.